A ready-to-customise 52-provision AI acceptable use policy template covering 8 policy domains. Built for CISOs and compliance teams who need a professional, board-ready policy document that employees actually understand and follow. Maps to HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR, EU AI Act, ISO 42001, and NIST AI RMF.
A ready-to-customise AI acceptable use policy with 52 provisions across 8 domains. Covers approved tools, data handling, prohibited activities, IP ownership, and enforcement procedures.
Only 5% of organisations have a formal AI acceptable use policy despite 75% of knowledge workers now using generative AI at work (McKinsey 2024 Global AI Survey) - making an AI AUP the single most impactful governance document most companies are missing.
Organisations without AI-specific security controls pay $1.76 million more per data breach (IBM 2024 Cost of a Data Breach) - a well-enforced acceptable use policy is the foundational control that reduces exposure across every AI interaction, from prompt-level data leakage to unsanctioned tool adoption.
This 52-provision template maps to 6 compliance frameworks (HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR, EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF) simultaneously - enabling compliance teams to satisfy multiple regulatory requirements from a single policy document rather than maintaining separate policies for each framework.
Gartner projects that by 2026, organisations that operationalise AI transparency and trust will see their AI models achieve a 50% improvement in adoption and business outcomes - an acceptable use policy is the foundational layer that makes transparency and trust operational rather than aspirational.
The average time to detect and contain a data breach is 258 days (IBM 2024), but AI-related data exposure through prompts can happen in seconds. This template includes real-time enforcement provisions, not just written rules - covering DLP integration, prompt monitoring, and automated policy violation alerting that catches exposure at the point of occurrence.
A ready-to-customise policy document with 52 provisions across 8 domains to govern AI usage across your organisation.
Establish why the AI acceptable use policy exists, who it applies to, and what it governs. A well-scoped purpose statement is the foundation that makes every subsequent provision enforceable.
Maintain a whitelist of sanctioned AI tools and platforms that have been security-assessed and approved for use. The approved tools registry is the single most referenced section of any AI acceptable use policy.
Deploy a comprehensive AI acceptable use policy that reduces organisational risk exposure, satisfies board governance requirements, and provides enforceable controls across all AI interactions
Adopt a pre-mapped policy template that addresses HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR, EU AI Act, ISO 42001, and NIST AI RMF requirements in a single document, reducing compliance mapping effort by weeks
Establish clear intellectual property ownership rules, liability boundaries, and contractual obligations for AI-generated outputs across the organisation
Implement a clear, fair AI usage policy with enforceable guidelines, defined consequences for violations, and an exception process that employees can actually navigate
Define which AI tools are sanctioned for engineering workflows, establish code generation guardrails, and create an approved tools registry that balances security with developer productivity
Sections 3 and 4 include specific provisions for AI systems interacting with PHI, including BAA requirements for AI vendors, minimum necessary access controls for AI-generated clinical summaries, and explicit prohibitions on using patient data in public AI models. The template addresses the FDA's evolving guidance on AI/ML-based software as a medical device.
Sections 4 and 7 address AI-specific requirements for financial services, including prohibitions on AI-assisted trading decisions without human oversight, restrictions on customer financial data in AI prompts, model risk management provisions aligned to SR 11-7, and DORA-compliant vendor assessment criteria for AI providers in the technology supply chain.
Sections 5 and 6 establish mandatory human review requirements for AI-assisted legal research, prohibit submission of AI-generated content to courts without attorney verification, define privilege and confidentiality boundaries for AI interactions, and address the ethical obligations law firms face when using AI tools on client matters.
Sections 2 and 7 align to Executive Order 14110 requirements for safe, secure, and trustworthy AI, NIST AI RMF Govern and Manage functions, and FedRAMP authorization requirements for AI cloud services. The template includes provisions for handling CUI and classified data boundaries with AI systems.
Establish why the AI acceptable use policy exists, who it applies to, and what it governs. A well-scoped purpose statement is the foundation that makes every subsequent provision enforceable. This section should be reviewed by legal counsel and signed off by executive leadership.
Maintain a whitelist of sanctioned AI tools and platforms that have been security-assessed and approved for use. The approved tools registry is the single most referenced section of any AI acceptable use policy - it must be easy to find, easy to understand, and kept current.
Define which data classification tiers can interact with which AI tools and under what conditions. Data handling rules are the operational core of the policy - they translate abstract security principles into specific, enforceable behaviours that employees can follow at the point of use.
Establish clear red lines that define what employees must never do with AI tools, regardless of the business justification. Explicit prohibitions eliminate ambiguity and provide the foundation for enforcement. These provisions should be communicated during onboarding and reinforced through annual training.
Take our 2-minute assessment and get a personalised AI governance readiness report with specific recommendations for your organisation.
Start Free AssessmentDefine when and how human review of AI-generated outputs is mandatory. The EU AI Act specifically requires human oversight for high-risk AI systems, and even where not legally mandated, human review is essential for managing quality, accuracy, and reputational risk. This section operationalises the principle that AI augments human judgment rather than replacing it.
Clarify who owns AI-generated outputs, how they should be attributed, and what intellectual property risks employees need to manage. IP ownership of AI-generated content remains legally unsettled in most jurisdictions, making clear organisational policy essential for risk management. These provisions should be reviewed by legal counsel with IP expertise.
Map AI acceptable use provisions to the regulatory frameworks that apply to your organisation. Proactive compliance mapping ensures every policy provision serves double duty - governing employee behaviour while simultaneously satisfying auditor requirements. This section should be maintained in collaboration with legal and compliance teams.
Define how the policy is enforced, what happens when violations occur, and how employees can request legitimate exceptions. An acceptable use policy without enforcement provisions is merely advisory. This section ensures the policy has teeth while maintaining fairness through a transparent exception process.
Build a complete AI governance programme with these complementary templates.
A comprehensive 47-point checklist across 9 security domains to help CISOs build a board-ready AI governance policy. Covers acceptable use, data classification, shadow AI, vendor assessment, compliance mapping, incident response, and more.
Download FreeAn 18-page operational playbook with 56 action items across 8 discovery phases for finding, assessing, and remediating unsanctioned AI usage across your organisation. Covers network-level detection, browser extension monitoring, SaaS auditing, department surveys, risk scoring, migration pathways, and ongoing safe harbour programmes.
Download FreeA comprehensive data classification framework with 50 controls across 8 domains for governing data flows through AI systems. Defines 5 classification tiers (Public, Internal, Confidential, Restricted, Prohibited), DLP rule templates, workspace isolation patterns, and lifecycle management procedures to prevent data leakage, ensure regulatory compliance, and maintain auditability across every stage of the AI data pipeline.
Download FreeShadow AI is the use of unauthorized AI tools by employees without IT oversight. Learn how to detect, prevent, and govern shadow AI across your enterprise - without blocking productivity.
A step-by-step framework for creating an AI governance program in a mid-market organization. Covers stakeholder alignment, policy development, tool selection, deployment, compliance mapping, and measurement with a 90-day implementation timeline.
The definitive AI compliance checklist for enterprises: 50 essential controls mapped across 12 regulatory frameworks including EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, GDPR, Colorado AI Act, and more. Prioritized by risk level with implementation guidance.
Fill in your details below for instant access to the full 14-page checklist.
“This framework saved us 3 months of policy development. We went from zero AI governance to audit-ready in under 2 weeks.”
— Security Leader, Mid-Market Healthcare Organisation
Need more than a checklist?
See how Areebi automates and enforces every control in this checklist across your entire organisation.
Book a DemoThe checklist tells you what to do. Areebi does it for you - automated DLP, audit logging, policy enforcement, and compliance reporting across every AI interaction.